The situation
The client sold a slow feeder bowl for pets — a competitive but healthy niche. Sales had been running at a steady $40–60K per month for months. Linear. Predictable. But profit wasn't matching the revenue. The brand was generating solid top-line numbers and leaving most of it on the table.
When he came to me, the first thing I did wasn't touch the bids. I looked at the data upstream — impressions, clicks, conversion rate. What I found was the real problem.
The diagnosis
The account was generating strong impressions — the ads were showing up, the keywords were relevant, the budget wasn't the issue. But the click-through rate was weak. Customers were seeing the product and scrolling past it.
That's a listing problem, not a PPC problem. Specifically, it was a main image problem. On Amazon, your main image is your ad. It's what customers see in search results before they click anything. If it doesn't stop the scroll, no amount of bid optimisation will fix your numbers.
When I looked at the main image, the issue was obvious. The product's packaging — which was actually premium and visually strong — wasn't shown at all. The listing also wasn't communicating the key benefit clearly at thumbnail size. Competitors with weaker products were outclicking it simply because their images communicated faster.
What I changed
Rebuilt the main image
Added the brand's packaging prominently to the main image — it was premium and completely missing. Tweaked the composition to communicate the product's key benefit immediately at thumbnail size. The goal: stop the scroll.
Optimised the full listing
Rewrote bullets and title to match actual search intent in the pet slow feeder category. Aligned backend keywords with what was converting in the ad data.
Tightened PPC structure
Cleaned up campaigns alongside the listing changes — cut spend going to terms that weren't converting, reallocated to the keywords that matched the improved listing. Better image + right keywords = conversion rate jumps.
The results
The chart tells the story in one glance. From September through December, sales (blue) and profit (green) ran in the same flat pattern — revenue was decent, profit was thin. From January, after the changes, the lines diverge sharply.
By May, sales had actually come down slightly — but profit more than doubled, reaching over $65K. That's the outcome when you fix the actual problem: the same traffic, better qualified, converting at a higher rate, with less wasted ad spend dragging margins down.
More revenue is not always the answer. Better conversion is.
Blue = Sales. Green = Profit. Sales stay flat from Jan onwards — but profit breaks away and more than doubles by May. The gap between the bars is where the work happened.
Good sales but thin margins?
There's usually a conversion problem hiding in plain sight. I'll find it.
Get in touch